Who Will Support The Troops? News on Citizens in Armed Service

Rand Corporation: ‘There is no battlefield solution to terrorism’ – George Washington blog 7/29/08

Self-Described CIA ‘Manchurian Candidates’ Gather to Share Fractured Memories – Congressional Quarterly 7/11/08

Houston’s KBR denies blame in soldiers’ electrocutions – Houston Chronicle 7/30/08

America’s Cyborg Warriors – Global Research 7/23/08

Synthetic Pot as a Military Weapon? Meet the Man Who Ran the Secret Program – Alternet 7/19/08

Army seeking psychologically inspired object recognition system – Engadget 7/18/08

DARPA moves ahead with electronic tags for soldiers – Engadget 7/18/08

Troops electrocuted in Iraq ‘almost daily’ – Raw Story 7/17/08

Modular Special Forces weapon one step closer to deployment – CNet 7/31/08

Strained by war, U.S. Army promotes unqualified soldiers – Salon 7/30/08

Another Air Force official involved in Minot nuclear SNAFU is ‘suicided’ – Cryptogon 7/30/08

The US Army would have you believe that PFC. LaVena L. Johnson broke her own nose, poured lye in her own vagina, and then committed suicide with a gunshot wound to the head. – St Louis American 6/4/08

GAO report: Three bases fail to examine troops properly – USA Today 6/11/08

The Vast and Dangerous Transfer of American Spying to Mercenary Companies – Alternet 7/28/08

Army knew Alaska base family housing was toxic – PEER 7/7/08


Torture Teachers – Salon 6/29/08

“An Army document proves that Guantánamo interrogators were taught by instructors from a military school that trains U.S. soldiers how to resist torture.”

Disposable Heroes: Veterans used to test drug-suicide link – ABC 6/17/08

A Generals’ False Testimony on KBR – MotherJones 6/5/08

“Will the Pentagon correct Major Gen. Jerome Johnson’s tainted testimony on the potentially contaminated water KBR provided to the troops?”

America’s Medicated Army – TIME 6/5/08

Vietnam: The Soldier’s Revolt – Int’l Socialist Review August 2000

Long, but very relevant and interesting historical reading…
EXCERPTS: “…After Tet, there was a massive shift from combat avoidance to mutiny. One Pentagon official reflected that “mutiny became so common that the army was forced to disguise its frequency by talking instead of ‘combat refusal.'” Combat refusal, one commentator observed, “resembled a strike and occurred when GIs refused, disobeyed, or negotiated an order into combat.”
Acts of mutiny took place on a scale previously only encountered in revolutions. The first mutinies in 1968 were unit and platoon-level rejections of the order to fight. The army recorded 68 such mutinies that year. By 1970, in the 1st Air Cavalry Division alone, there were 35 acts of combat refusal. One military study concluded that combat refusal was “unlike mutinous outbreaks of the past, which were usually sporadic, short-lived events. The progressive unwillingness of American soldiers to fight to the point of open disobedience took place over a four-year period between 1968-71.”
The 1968 combat refusals of individual units expanded to involve whole companies by the next year. The first reported mass mutiny was in the 196th Light Brigade in August 1969. Company A of the 3rd Battalion, down to 60 men from its original 150, had been pushing through Songchang Valley under heavy fire for five days when it refused an order to advance down a perilous mountain slope. Word of the mutiny spread rapidly. The New York Daily News ran a banner headline, “Sir, My Men Refuse To Go.” The GI paper, The Bond, accurately noted, “It was an organized strike…A shaken brass relieved the company commander…but they did not charge the guys with anything. The Brass surrendered to the strength of the organized men.” …
When Cambodia was invaded in 1970, soldiers from Fire Base Washington conducted a sit-in. They told Up Against the Bulkhead, “We have no business there…we just sat down. Then they promised us we wouldn’t have to go to Cambodia.” Within a week, there were two additional mutinies, as men from the 4th and 8th Infantry refused to board helicopters to Cambodia.
In the invasion of Laos in March 1971, two platoons refused to advance. To prevent the mutiny from spreading, the entire squadron was pulled out of the Laos operation. The captain was relieved of his command, but there was no discipline against the men. When a lieutenant from the 501st Infantry refused his battalion commander’s order to advance his troops, he merely received a suspended sentence.”…
The hidden history of the 1960s proves that the American army can be split and won to the revolutionary movement. But that requires the long, slow patient work of explanation, of propaganda, of education, of organization, and of agitation and action. The Vietnam revolt shows how rank-and-file soldiers can rise to the task. The unfinished job is for revolutionary organization to also rise to that level. When it does, the troops of the American army can become the troops of the American revolution.

Leave a Comment so far
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: